`` Trifles By Susan Glaspell Is A Murder Mystery When You...

Women have faced oppression for the majority of history, and some still face this oppression today. In other countries, women are not allowed to show their faces, because it is disrespectful to their husbands. American women face a lesser issue in the pay scale difference, but it is still a viable one. The following questions come to mind: why are men placed on a higher pedestal? Do they work harder and think smarter, or does it come from a stereotype issue? In general, men are seen as powerful while women are feeble and need help. Not only do these gender stereotypes belittle women, but also they cause harsh feelings between the sexes. Literature can shed light on some of these feelings. Trifles by Susan Glaspell is a murder mystery when†¦show more content†¦This leads us into the next and largest action of the play: SHERIFF. We’ll be right out, Mr. Hale! ([...] Suddenly Mrs. Peters throws back quilt pieces and tries to put the box in the bag she is wearing. It is too big. She opens box, starts to take bird out, cannot touch it, goes to pieces, stands there helpless. Sound of a knob turning in the other room. Mrs. Hale snatches the box and puts it in the pocket of her big coat. [...]) (Glaspell 575) The women are reluctant to help Mrs. Wright, but with all they know, they decided to help her. Some many see this as wrong, because all crimes need to be punished. Although this is true, the reader must take into consideration what it takes to truly break someone to the point of committing murder. Symbols in the story were chosen for specific reasons, and they show a great deal about the time period and women. The symbols all point to one thing: oppression. When it was alive, the bird was caged for its beauty and song, and it is a literal symbol of Mrs. Wright. Also, the bird was a freedom Mrs. Wright had, and when it was killed, she lost all hope as seen through what is said about the bird: MRS. HALE. If there’d been years and years of nothing, then a bird to sing to you. It would be awful-- still, after the bird was still. (Glaspell 573) This excerpt of dialogue helps the reader understand how Mrs. Wright might have felt. Similarly, the fruit jars seem to represent Mrs. Wright

Fahrenheit 451 Knowledge and Ignorance - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 483 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2019/04/10 Category Literature Essay Level High school Topics: Fahrenheit 451 Essay Ray Bradbury Essay Did you like this example? Knowledge is a familiarity understanding of someone or something which is acquired by experience or education by perceiving. It is known as the body of truth, information and principles. Knowledge applies to fact acquired, observing and experiencing which one can do by reading and studying. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Fahrenheit 451: Knowledge and Ignorance" essay for you Create order In the book Fahrenheit 451 society has a huge impact if someone has knowledge or is seem bright because then they will not be equal as everyone else. This world is based upon a socially equality society. This society gains equality without education because citizens will not have a higher IQ than others. It as well gains no responsibility and sensibility. In the novel Fahrenheit 451 Guy known as Montag is a book burning robot he reports to work, copes with his suicidal wife and walks through his television obsessed world. Montag does not realize the harm he is doing nor cares. Although his 17 year old neighbor Clarisse shakes Montag out of his stupor. And I thought about books. And for the first time I realized that a man was behind each one of the books (Bradburry 49). Montag realizes that books have value and starts to understand why people read them in the first place. Clarisse has an extraordinary imagination and a passion for observation, she indirectly forces Guy to examine the world around him and inspires him to take action. Montag starts to steal and read books for himself which leads him to danger. Causing his wife to leave him because their house is ruined. She ran past with her body stiff, her face floured with powder, her mouth gone, without lipstick climbed in the beetle and sat mumbling poor family, poor family, oh everything gone (Bradbury 114). Montags wife Mildred refers to the items in the house when she says everything gone not caring she lost her husband. Mildred caring more for the items in their home than her husband says a lot about their society because it shows how items are more valuable than family. The people you shared memories with and spent a life with is not as important than items. Bradbury tries to get readers attention convey how our society will become if we let technology take control. Which is not true because although technology is really advance now people still have sentametle feelings and their knowledge is not limited. Overall the difference between Montag society and now is how they feel knowledge is to powerful and everyone should stay equal. We stand against the small tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting theory and thought (Bradbury 59). Captain Baily point of view on books is how unhappy it would make people feel therefore they should fix their problem by burning rather than facing it. This statement is different from society today because we live in a world where we have to be responsible and face our consequences rather than avoiding and fleeing.

Non-violent Methods are Better Way of Training Children Free Essays

As we know, physical punishment has always been an effective way for training animals. Once they become wild, flinging the whip is what we do to make them being well-behaved. However, does it work for training children? Are their behaviors all get better and better after that? In my point of view, I strongly object parents who admire that physical punishment is the best way to teach and train their own children. We will write a custom essay sample on Non-violent Methods are Better Way of Training Children or any similar topic only for you Order Now Although the pain of body is easy to make people learn the lesson, on the other hand, it may also be easy to leave the scars on body and heart, cause family problems and losing the opportunities for children to judge the right and wrong by themselves own. First of all, even the pain of punishment will disappear, the scars on body and heart somehow will remain for the entire life. With no doubt, teaching children not to spill the milk on the floor by simply slapping on their bottoms would be a rapid way to warn them not to make the same mistake again. However, I think your children would remember how bad you treat them more than the lesson they’ve learned and reflect this rage on their children in the future by teaching them in same way. In addition, some researches even have shown the causes of some criminal’s psychological problems can be traced back to their parents’ serious physical punishment or even abuse. The former dictator of Iraq Saddam Hussein would be a good example. Second, without violence in the house, I believe children will have a happier childhood and get along with their parents better when they grow up. If we observe the relationship between parents and children more carefully, it is not hard to find out the happiness existing in the house is not only connected to children’s behavior but also parents’. After all, simply punish them physically can’t make them easier to understand what exact the mistake they make because they only know it’s wrong but don’t know why it is wrong. However, although it takes more time, if you explain to them why they do is wrong and what bad results they may cause instead of punish them, then it would be easier to make them understand this mistake can not be done again without making an awkward atmosphere in the family. Finally, to let the children know what is right and what is wrong, I think the best way for them is to experience and judge by themselves. Like I mentioned above, the most important principle is let them know why it’s wrong. Once they find out, then their brain will naturally tell them not to do it before they get hurt (no matter by themselves or parents). For instance, even you strongly warned your children don’t get too close to the fire, they still want to touch and feel it what it is. But once they suffer from the pain of burning, I assure you they don’t dare to do it again on purpose. To make a conclusion, I think physical punishment is not the best way to train children. Although it is fast and effective sometimes, you will never know what consequences it may bring in the future. After all, compared to the bad relationship and many problems it may cause, the long time it takes to teach a child in a liberal and gentle way seems very worthy. How to cite Non-violent Methods are Better Way of Training Children, Papers

Soldiers Home - Hemingway free essay sample

Literary Analysis of Conflicts within â€Å"Soldier’s Home† Ernest Hemingway’s â€Å"Soldier’s Home† is a short story about one man’s struggle with returning home after war. Harold Krebs had just returned home, later than the majority of the soldiers, resulting in a dull welcoming from his town. In order to be heard, Krebs lies about his war experience through elaborated stories. Even though Krebs is home, he is lost- lost in society, lost with love, lost within himself. Although Hemingway does not describe much about what Krebs experienced during the war, it is obvious that this man went through a transformation, and returned with what an outsider looking in would call extreme apathy. Harold Krebs, along with millions of other men and women, experienced war, an undertaking many can and will never know. Because of his service, he will never be able to truly return home, return to fulfilling society’s wants, return to the old Harold Krebs. We will write a custom essay sample on Soldiers Home Hemingway or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Those who have never experienced what Krebs has, such as his own mother, will never understand what it was like, and will continue to force him to satisfy their standards of what is normal. Krebs’ sense of compassion and emotion was scarred in the war. He did not however, completely lose a sense of love. He loves pool. His sister said that if he loved her, he would go watch her game. He went. Krebs will never go back to his old self, but he will do his best to follow the expected cycle of life for a Kansas boy, in order to satisfy his parents’ wants. Krebs, unlike many soldiers, did not die in the war, but maybe that is the outcome for every soldier. For all soldiers alike, the war wins, not the people. Although some come home, their old selves die during the war. Krebs was a victim of the war. He died, and a soldier returned home. Hemingway speaks of this corporal as â€Å"Krebs† in the beginning of the story, just how he would have been addressed as a Marine. Later in the story we are introduced to a new character, Harold, Harold Krebs, Hare. Harold’s mother and sister, throughout their conversations with him, depict how this soldier was once a brother, a son, a friend. Harold attended a private college before the war. He was involved in a fraternity. He met society’s needs. This man left his home a man, but returned a soldier, who was now faced to fight a war within himself. Krebs returned lost and confused in the society he grew up in. He tried his best to find patterns and relearn the ways of the people he had once left behind. Detaching himself from society eased his attempt at a transition. The story shares that he went through a dynamic change during the war, but his character remains static. The beginning of the story, Harold had already transformed into Krebs. In the end, Hemingway leaves him still to be Krebs, lost in society, but trying his best to put on a show in order to fulfill the social constructions of a male his age. The experience of war transforms a person forever. So much that one is completely unable to fit back into the mold he or she once fit in. Hemingway depicts through this story how society demands that everyone live by and meet all of its social norms, and those who do not abide will be forced to fight their personal struggles alone and must keep them hidden from the rest of the world. Reintegration is impossible when you no longer fit the mold. This town he returned to lives off of conformity. The people all dress the same. His father drives the same car. Nothing has changed except for Krebs, and it seems that society is not accepting of this change. Krebs is forced to decide whether he should give into what they want or fight it and attempt to find who he once was in the war. Conformity is no sin. Good people live in the whirl wind of conformity, just like Harold’s mother. She is a God-fearing woman, but she is unable to accept the lethargy of a man who used to be her son. Krebs dislikes problems, complexity, or the issues that come along with life. He would rather observe the world, not participate it in, but the world will not let him sit out. He ties to feed into their wants by lying about the truth he once tried to share, but it was not good enough for them. His lies destroy him on the inside. Krebs opens up and attempts to let his mother know that he does not love anymore, but due to her innocent ignorance on his situation, she is unable to comprehend his state of being. Krebs seems to reach an end, but because of this incident, he is unable to. Krebs sense of being lost truly shows how society forced him to be a new kind of soldier, not for a country, but for his own individuality.